The Wedding Industrial Complex, Part I

ring.gif

I’ve been griping about weddings for quite some time now. Call me bitter. Call me cynical. Probably I’m a mix of both intermittently – particularly at weddings. At any rate, this year being one in which I won’t attend a single wedding, it seemed the best timing to theorize about the wedding industrial complex, hopefully without offending any of my friends. For the record, of the twelve weddings I’ve attended in the last four years, I’m fairly certain all the people actually getting married had a great time and were happy, and really that’s what the day is all about. Also for the record, I didn’t really like formals in college or dances in high school either – so maybe this is all just the adult extension of an inherent objection to getting dressed up and dancing. Finally, just to be clear, I don’t have an objection to the institution of marriage. I do believe that it’s both possible and reasonable to spend the bulk of your life with one person. How you find that person, I have no idea. I’m not sure I’m really looking just yet. But that’s another story.

My objection to the wedding industrial complex comes from two distinct places. The first is a more personal aversion. It comes from the place of being a chronically single person who (for what are probably defensive, self-protective reasons) finds herself uncomfortable with the concept of romance. The second is purely fiscal in nature. I was by no means raised in a frugal atmosphere, but I learned to think of money with a sense of responsibility and practicality.

I don’t think I really need to define the wedding-industrial complex, right? It’s everything from the magazines to the romantic comedies, the websites to the dress fittings, the flowers, showers, rings, and registries. It’s spending thousands upon thousands of dollars on one piece of jewelry and one big day.  It’s women being lavished upon and rescued by men.

Part I is about the ring. It all starts with the ring. Until recently I think I was just as convinced as every other girl that I needed or wanted a big diamond ring on my left hand. What changed my mind? Well, first of all there’s the fact that the size of diamond that every girl thinks is necessary seems to be dependent mostly on how important a social status marker it is for them. How big are their friends’ rings? How much can Mr-Ring-Buyer afford? How big are the rings at the grocery store or the boutique around the corner? How big was mom’s ring? How important is money and socioeconomic status to the couple? It doesn’t seem to have a lot to do with anything about the relationship. When I questioned a friend once on the practicality of buying the ring if money was tight, she explained, “Well, it’s really important to us.” Really? More than housing and groceries and having a social life? More than the down payment on a house? When I moved from grad school and Massachusetts to Manhattan and the land of new money, the rings got significantly bigger. It’s ostentatious consumption at it’s best. I haven’t even watched Blood Diamond yet, but you can bet that it’ll only add fuel to my fire. The mere fact that there is a process for certifying diamonds as conflict-free makes the industry suspect. I also love when girls talk about what size ring looks good on their hand. Please. On the other hand, I’m not really one to buck tradition and I do think there’s something important about having some sort of symbol, so what’s my suggested alternative? It seems to me like there ought to be plenty of vintage, ready to be reused gems out there. Since the traditional diamond engagement ring didn’t become a “custom” until the mid 1900s (thanks to brilliant De Beers marketing), there are hundreds of years of precedent to draw inspiration from.

Now, because I like to try to play my own devil’s advocate, I find myself wondering how I would respond if I were ever offered a ring by someone I loved. I can see how it would be hard to say no. I guess the question would be what was the motivation for his buying it? Did he buy it because he wanted to or because he felt like he had to? And would I look at it for years to come wondering what else it could have paid for? What amazing trip or year of tuition? I know there are plenty of women out there who dreamed of their rings and weddings as children and are happy for this one remnant of fairytale in our lives. I’m not saying it’s wrong for them, just that it probably deserves some thoughtful consideration.

This entry was posted in Culture, Life. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Wedding Industrial Complex, Part I

  1. Marc says:

    I like the idea of this series. I’m looking forward to part 2. Will it be save the date cards? Wedding cakes? Photographers? So much inflation goes into weddings!

  2. Silsby says:

    A simple gold band on the left ring finger says it all. Anybody with an IQ over 90 does not give a crap about the size of the diamond. A suggested trilogy:

    Part I–can the stone
    Part II–can the big ceremony
    Part III–get the pre-nup

  3. Stephanie says:

    Very funny I think.

    On some level I agree, as a married girl who has two items of jewelry I routinely wear (1 being my engagement/wedding rings, 2 being diamond earings, both from my husband) I have to say there was definately a practicality to my ring. Anything too big would bother me or hurt an animal :) But Scott had issues with this, what would a smallish ring say about what he could afford, my response is who the hell cares, I have to be happy.

    And while I did have a wedding with many wedding-institutional things, we also tried to have something not over the top and that we liked, sorry for all those that like dancing and fanciness. Essentially I agree with you, but somehow it becomes hard to not get all entwined in it all.

    So in the end, ignore all the crap, and make it what you want. Try not to offend the parents or in-laws, as they usually pay a chunk, but if they are crazy or WAY out of sink with you, offend them too. :)

    As for the comment about yellow gold band, well, I mean really, who really likes yellow gold bands, maybe my parents. Lets be serious, platinum, white gold, or titanium is the only way to go ;)

  4. Lila says:

    I also agree on some level. Being that my wedding was one of the 12 (and one that you were actually a bridesmaid in), I think we have had conversations hinting that you had some of the feelings listed above.

    I loved my wedding, and I’m glad that we did what we did. If anything, it was a really fun party (at least everyone tells me it was) in a pretty location. Yes, it was expensive, and yes I feel bad about that, regularly. I definetely got caught up in the “wedding” to do list, tradition, etc. I think that if I had to do it again, it would be similar, but instead of making everyone dress up, it would be a casual BBQ in the backyard. Tim and I really are not fancy at all, and I think our wedding was a bit fancier than our personalities. Oh, and Hudson would have been the “ring dog”. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t change anything else.

    And about rings. . . My engagement ring (which was stolen BTW) was my grandmothers large diamond with two tanzanite stones that Tim and I bought in Tanzania, and was in part about the symbolism of marraige and having a pretty ring, but also was very meaningful to both of us. I now have a beautiful (and much smaller) ring that we re-designed from an older piece of jewelry. I love it and its size is much more our style!

    Anyway, sorry for the long comment. My point, however, is that I agree on many levels!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree